Friday, October 10, 2008

WRITING TO A FICTIONAL AUDIENCE

Walter J. Ong says that writing demands a “constructed audience.” What does this mean?

History reveals a time when primary orality was the predominant form of communication and/or education to a person, group, and community (an audience). A speaker can physically see his/her audience. Because of this, the speaker can know right away how to address the audience, and can change strategies on demand (Ong, 1982).

Conversely, writers do not have this audience vantage point privy to orators and both writers and readers are missing “extratextual context” (Ong, 1982 p.102). “Lack of verifiable context is what makes writing normally so much more agonizing an activity than oral presentation to a real audience… The writer must “set up a role in which absent and often unknown readers can cast themselves” (Ong, 1982, p.102).

Therefore, “The writer’s audience is always fiction” (Ong, 1982 p.102). (For the complete lecture on the quote used in Ong’s Orality and literacy click the quote above)

Ong basically explains that our audience is constructed by the writer. “Writers project audiences for their work by imagining the presumptive audiences of other pieces of writing[…] Readers seem willing to be fictionalized in this way—to be the audience projected by the writer—as long as the reader's role is familiar or the writer creates a new role persuasively. Thus, the writer's style or voice is a way of addressing an imagined audience that will respond in the desired way” (Ong, 1975).

What is an Audience?
As defined in Dictionary.com:
au·di·ence - Pronunciation [aw-dee-uh ns] –noun
1. The group of spectators at a public event; listeners or viewers collectively, as in attendance at a theater or concert: The audience was respectful of the speaker's opinion.
2. The persons reached by a book, radio or television broadcast, etc.; public: Some works of music have a wide and varied audience.


A Company’s Audience
Recently, I was writing website copy for the company I work for
www.powderblueproductions.com . I emailed it to our vice president for approval. She asked me to rewrite it. I asked, “Why?” She said, “Because the verbiage and vocabulary is far advanced for our [audience]. Jazz it up with simple, energetic wording.” Due to my current reading and writing curricula for graduate school, I had lost sight of who I was writing too, my audience. I realize that we can’t just write something without thinking about who we want our audience to be.

A Politicians Audience
In other cases, people are aware of the audience they are constructing when writing speeches are political text. In fact many politicians hire a team of people to assist them in this area of their campaings. However, even a speaker or reader may miss-interpret what they hear or read. Please watch the following video. Watch the expressions of people standing behind him as well as his own. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lT0OE0tuA1A Later on John Kerry does explain that he was tired after long hours on the campaign trail and he indeed “read the joke wrong.” I wonder if the person who wrote that joke was looking for a new job the following day?




Live Audience Vs. Fictional Audience
Although orality exists today, technology allows additional platforms for people to communicate ideas, stories, educate, inform and more. Vibing with Ong, writing along with all technologies restructure conciseness over time developing, primary orality into a form of secondary orality. As a result this changed and continues to change the way we speak and/or the construct of our prose.

“I style the orality of a culture totally untouched by any knowledge of writing or print, 'primary orality'. It is 'primary' by contrast with the 'secondary orality' of present-day high technology culture, in which a new orality is sustained by telephone, radio, television and other electronic devices that depend for their existence and functioning on writing and print. Today primary culture in the strict sense hardly exists, since every culture knows of writing and has some experience of its effects. Still, to varying degrees many cultures and sub-cultures, even in a high-technology ambiance, preserve much of the mind-set of primary orality” (Walter J. Ong. Orality and Literacy, p. 11).

Conclusion:
Finally, there are two points writers should recognize when constructing our audience:
1. Our period’s growth of technology and communication tools has increased the scope of our ‘audience’.
2. It is important to recognize that as we ‘construct an audience’ that over time that audience (even though they are fiction) will continue to change.



References

Audience. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved October 10, 2008, from Dictionary.com website:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/audience

Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing the Word. New York: Methuen

Ong, W. J. (1975). The writer’s audience is always a fiction. PMLA, 90, 9-21.

Ong, W.J. (1974),
The Writer's Audience is Always a Fiction. Fourteen page typescript from one of Ong's Lincoln Lecture tour lectures. Retrieved October 10, 2008 from the Walter J. Ong digital collection at Saint Louis University http://libraries.slu.edu/sc/ong/digital/texts/lincoln/lincoln04_en.pdf

Additional Sites Viewed:
http://www.birminghampost.net/life-leisure-birmingham-guide/postfeatures/2008/09/19/celebrating-birmingham-s-literary-heritage-65233-21856801/
http://www.google.com/search?sa=N&tab=nw&q=who%20dictates%20a%20constructed%20audience (who)
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=what+dictates+a+constructed+audience (What dictates news)
http://tlu.ecom.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/essaywritingattitude.pdf
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/bljohnkerryjokes.htm
http://books.google.com/books?id=CeWuv8B_ERkC&pg=PA37&lpg=PA37&dq=writing+demands+a+constructed+audience&source=web&ots=csGD97KIp6&sig=lzQfsmEpu8EaRJP6IJl3qLX4kZI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result http://books.google.com/books?id=pLcSIGgWB14C&pg=PA108&lpg=PA108&dq=who+dictates+a+constructed+audience&source=web&ots=8b5oWMxUMW&sig=PjkNmqHrgZToBgSWWa7L3c28N-I&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result

Saturday, September 27, 2008

WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN MYSPACE?


How many of you are Linkedin to Myspace or spending time on Facebook? Well if you are then welcome to the world of virtual communities.

Approximately three to four years ago, I was looking for a friend I had lost touch with Donovan. He was in a band, so I “Googled” him and the band name,
Wayside. After finding the bands homepage, I discovered the band had gone by the wayside. I went back to the Google search page and noticed my friend had a MySpace page. Eureka, I found him! However, the only way to connect was via computer mediated communication (CMC) and for me to become part of his virtual community. I joined MySpace, set up my profile, uploaded a picture, and my space on MySpace was ready to go! It was very exciting to be reunited with my friend and technology made this happen! We were able to reconnect, exchange numbers and organized a face-to-face (ftf) reunion.

As pleased as I was that MySpace allowed me to revive a long lost friendship, do I believe, based on my education about community, that it is possible to make a virtual community? No. Yes? Well, maybe.


“Remember also that the dichotomy between ‘real’ and ‘virtual’ often implies that anything ‘virtual’ isn’t real” (Thurlow, Lengel, Tomic, 2004, p.70).

People have different opinions about what “community” means to them. Further community structures and the needs of people in the community change over time (Thurlow et al., 2004).

We must first examine and understand the definitions of community and virtual community to attempt to prove validity of creating a successful online society.

What is a Community?
I found two standard definitions on
dictionary.com:
1. “Social group of any size whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common cultural and historical heritage.”

2. “a social, religious, occupational, or other group sharing common characteristics or interests and perceived or perceiving itself as distinct in some respect from the larger society within which it exists (usually prec. by the): the business community; the community of scholars.”

In fact, the term community is often used as a rhetorical tool for creating a sense of comfort or establishing a sense of togetherness (Thurlow et al., 2004).

What is a Virtual Community?
It makes sense that when searching to define virtual communities that in this day in age, I would find as many opinions and explanations as I’d find with the term community. The following are two I found to be useful:
1. “Virtual communities are social aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspace” (Weinreich, 1997).

2. “Online or virtual community is the gathering of people, in an online "space" where they come, communicate, connect, and get to know each other better over time. From that point on, the rest is up to you. Your community will be what you and your members make of it” (Boetcher, Duggan, White, 2002).

Why Build a Virtual Community?
For many, including me, creating and maintaining a community is an essential part of life, work, hobbies, and such. “The structural process that is associated with community is communication. Without communication there can be no action to organize social relations” (Fernback & Thompson, 1995).

By building virtual communities, it allows people to complement and supplement their non-virtual communities. For example, going back to my search for Donovan, joining MySpace allowed me to reconnect with a friend who was formerly part of my real-life community. We had lost touch – without the virtual world I may not have been able to re-connect with him. In addition, after a year on MySpace I only had four friends. I re-adapted my virtual world towards my job (at my bosses request). I was able to create a synergy between two communities (non-virtual and virtual) to keep the communication alive and strong so our customers can feel connected to the company and to me, making it a somewhat “more personal” experience. It is important to mention that 99% of my “friends” on MySpace have communicated via ftf with me at one time or another.

Interestingly enough, there are other reasons people manufacture virtual communities. (See Video_Virtual Communities) “Some people use virtual communities as a form of psychotherapy. Others, such as the most addicted players of Minitel in France or Multi-User Dungeons (MUDs) on the international networks, spend eighty hours a week or more pretending they are someone else, living a life that does not exist outside a computer” (Weinreich, 1997).

Conclusion
In the “real” world every type of community has its strengths and weakness, good and bad. This can also be said for the world of virtual communities. Those who attempt to construct a virtual community in hopes of creating a utopian society may encounter problems. For even in the virtual world one must find a sense of reality.

References
Boetcher, S., Duggan, H., White, N. (2002). What is a Virtual Community and why would you ever need One?? Full Circle.com. Retreived September 26, 2008, from
http://www.fullcirc.com/community/communitywhatwhy.htm

Community. (n.d.). Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary. Retrieved September 28, 2008, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/community

Fernback, J., Thompson B. (1995). Virtual Communities: Abort, Retry, Failure? Retrieved September 27, 2008 from http://www.rheingold.com/texts/techpolitix/VCcivil.html

Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer Mediated Communication: Social interaction and the Internet. London: SAGE.

Weinreich, F. (1997) Establishing a Point of View Toward Virtual Communities. CMC Magazine online. Retrieved, September 26, 2008 http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1997/feb/weinsen.html
Additional Sites Visited:


Video Clips Viewed: